Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
A preliminary clinical trial using flowable glass-ionomer cement asa liner in proximal-ART restorations: The operator effect
Bonifácio, Clarissa-Calil; Loveren, Cor Van; Amerongen, W. Evert Van; Hesse, Daniela; Bönecker, Marcelo; Raggio, Daniela-Prócida.
Affiliation
  • Bonifácio, Clarissa-Calil; Academic Centre for Dentistry Amsterdam (ACTA). Department of Conservative and Preventive Dentistry. The Netherlands. Amsterdam
  • Loveren, Cor Van; Academic Centre for Dentistry Amsterdam (ACTA). Department of Conservative and Preventive Dentistry. The Netherlands. Amsterdam
  • Amerongen, W. Evert Van; Academic Centre for Dentistry Amsterdam (ACTA). Department of Conservative and Preventive Dentistry. The Netherlands. Amsterdam
  • Hesse, Daniela; University of São Paulo. School of Dentistry. Department of Pediatric Dentistry. São Paulo. Brazil
  • Bönecker, Marcelo; University of São Paulo. School of Dentistry. Department of Pediatric Dentistry. São Paulo. Brazil
  • Raggio, Daniela-Prócida; University of São Paulo. School of Dentistry. Department of Pediatric Dentistry. São Paulo. Brazil
Med. oral patol. oral cir. bucal (Internet) ; 18(3): 529-532, mayo 2013. ilus, tab
Article in En | IBECS | ID: ibc-112720
Responsible library: ES1.1
Localization: BNCS
ABSTRACT
Objectives: This in vivo study was carried out to assess the influence of the operator experience on the survival rate of proximal-ART restorations using a two-layer technique to insert the glass-ionomer cement (GIC).Study Design: Forty five proximal cavities in primary molars were restored in a school setting according to the ART technique. The cavities were restored by two operators with Ketac Molar Easymix, and received a flowablelayer of GIC prior to a second GIC layer with a regular consistency. The operators had different clinical experiences with ART (no experience or two years of experience), but both completed a one-week training to perform the restorations and the GIC mixing in this study. Results: After a 12-month follow-up, 74% of the restorations survived; the main reason for failure was bulk fracture or total loss of the restoration. There was no operator influence (log-rank test p=0.2)Conclusion: The results encourage future well designed controlled clinical trials using the two-layer technique for insertion of GIC in proximal-ART restorations, after training the operators (AU)
Subject(s)
Search on Google
Collection: 06-national / ES Database: IBECS Main subject: Dental Atraumatic Restorative Treatment / Glass Ionomer Cements Type of study: Clinical_trials Limits: Humans Language: En Journal: Med. oral patol. oral cir. bucal (Internet) Year: 2013 Document type: Article
Search on Google
Collection: 06-national / ES Database: IBECS Main subject: Dental Atraumatic Restorative Treatment / Glass Ionomer Cements Type of study: Clinical_trials Limits: Humans Language: En Journal: Med. oral patol. oral cir. bucal (Internet) Year: 2013 Document type: Article